Social Networking Becoming more Invisible But More Ubiquitous?

The Economist notes that while social networking efforts haven’t found profitable financial models, there is evidence that they are migrating to more of a common model that is less proprietary and more in the background, like air.

“Historically, online media tend to start this way. The early services, such as CompuServe, Prodigy or AOL, began as ‘walled gardens’ before they opened up to become websites. The early e-mail services could send messages only within their own walls (rather as Facebook’s messaging does today). Instant-messaging, too, started closed, but is gradually opening up. In social networking, this evolution is just beginning. Parts of the industry are collaborating in a ‘data portability workgroup’ to let people move their friend lists and other information around the web. Others are pushing OpenID, a plan to create a single, federated sign-on system that people can use across many sites.

“The opening of social networks may now accelerate thanks to that older next big thing, web-mail. As a technology, mail has come to seem rather old-fashioned. But Google, Yahoo!, Microsoft and other firms are now discovering that they may already have the ideal infrastructure for social networking in the form of the address books, in-boxes and calendars of their users. ‘E-mail in the wider sense is the most important social network,’ says David Ascher, who manages Thunderbird, a cutting-edge open-source e-mail application, for the Mozilla Foundation, which also oversees the popular Firefox web browser.

“That is because the extended in-box contains invaluable and dynamically updated information about human connections. On Facebook, a social graph notoriously deteriorates after the initial thrill of finding old friends from school wears off. By contrast, an e-mail account has access to the entire address book and can infer information from the frequency and intensity of contact as it occurs. Joe gets e-mails from Jack and Jane, but opens only Jane’s; Joe has Jane in his calendar tomorrow, and is instant-messaging with her right now; Joe tagged Jack ‘work only’; in his address book. Perhaps Joe’s party photos should be visible to Jane, but not Jack.

“This kind of social intelligence can be applied across many services on the open web. Better yet, if there is no pressure to make a business out of it, it can remain intimate and discreet. Facebook has an economic incentive to publish ever more data about its users, says Mr Ascher, whereas Thunderbird, which is an open-source project, can let users minimize what they share. Social networking may end up being everywhere, and yet nowhere.”

socialcapital.wordpress.com

What Facebook Really Says About You

What does your Facebook or My Space page say about you? Maybe more than you realise.
Social networking sites soared in popularity

Research has found users of social networking sites fall into one of five distinct types of people - which may reveal more about you than the rest of your profile.

According to a study users fall into one of the following categories:

Alpha socialisers: Mostly male, under 25s, who use sites in intense short bursts to flirt, meet new people and be entertained.

Attention seekers: Mostly female, who crave attention and comments from others, often posting photos and customising their profiles.

Followers: Males and females of all ages who join sites to keep up with what their peers are doing.

Faithfuls: Older males and females generally aged over 20, who typically use social networking sites to rekindle old friendships, often from school or university.

Functionals: Mostly older males who tended to be single-minded in using sites for a particular use.

The study found three types of people who would not use social networking sites.

They were those concerned about safety, those who were technically inexperienced or people who consider it a waste of time.

The research, by communications watchdog Ofcom, also found nearly half of all children with access to the internet had their own personal profile on a social networking site.

A total of 49% of eight to 17-year-olds had their own profile, while 22% of adults also used such sites.

But it was more common for adults than children to have profiles on more than one networking site.

news.sky.com